A DBA carrier can be ordered to pay Defense Base Act attorney fees when, within 30 days of written notice of the claim from the Department of Labor, it refuses to pay anything on the ground that it owes nothing. If the contractor then wins with a lawyer’s help, the fee is paid in addition to the benefits, not out of them.

Friedman, Rodman & Frank, P.A. represents civilian contractors in Defense Base Act claims against employers and their insurance carriers, wherever the injury happened and wherever the contractor now lives.

When the Carrier Pays Defense Base Act Attorney Fees Under Section 28(a)

A fee-shifting provision is a law that moves the cost of the winning side’s lawyer onto the losing side. Section 28(a) is one. It applies when the carrier denies liability outright and does not pay within the 30-day window, and the contractor later succeeds. The fee is set in the compensation order at a reasonable amount approved by the Department of Labor, the Benefits Review Board, or a court. The carrier pays it directly to the attorney in a lump sum once the order becomes final.

Section 28(d) adds that the carrier may also be charged witness fees and mileage for necessary witnesses. Fees and costs awarded against the carrier “shall not in any respect affect or diminish the compensation payable.” A contractor who wins under Section 28(a) keeps the full benefit award.

Disputes Over Additional Compensation Under Section 28(b)

A DBA claim can also start with the carrier paying benefits voluntarily, without an award, and then disputing how much more is owed. Section 28(b) covers that situation. The Department of Labor holds an informal conference and recommends a resolution in writing. A carrier that rejects the recommendation must, within 14 days, pay or offer in writing whatever additional amount it believes is owed.

If the contractor turns down that amount, uses a lawyer, and is later awarded more, the carrier pays a fee based only on the difference between the award and what it paid or offered. There is an exception for disputes over the degree or length of disability. It applies where the carrier offers to have the contractor evaluated by physicians the Secretary of Labor employs or selects and to pay based on that report. Outside these rules, the statute says a claim for legal services “shall not be assessed against the employer or carrier.”

Fee Approval and the Lien on Benefits

Section 28(c) requires every fee for a claimant’s attorney to be approved. When the obligation to pay falls on the contractor rather than the carrier, the approved fee can be made a lien on the compensation due under an award. The order approving the fee sets the amount and how it is paid.

Section 28(e) makes it a federal crime to take a fee for representing a claimant without that approval, or to make a business of soliciting these claims. Each offense carries a fine of up to $1,000, up to one year in prison, or both. A percentage agreement signed with anyone, lawyer or not, still has to go through that approval before money changes hands.

Questions About Fees Before You Hire a Lawyer

Whether a fee would come from the carrier or from an approved lien on your award depends on how the carrier has handled the claim so far. The denial letter and the payment history usually answer that question. Friedman, Rodman & Frank, P.A. handles Defense Base Act claims for civilian contractors injured on overseas government contracts. Call our office at (877) 448-8585 or send us a message and we will go through your claim with you at no charge.

The post Who Pays Your Defense Base Act Lawyer? How Section 28 Can Shift the Fee to the Carrier appeared first on Defense Base Act Attorneys | Friedman, Rodman & Frank, P.A..

Under Section 14(e), the DBA late payment penalty is an added 10 percent on any installment not paid within 14 days after it becomes due, paid along with the late installment. It does not apply if the employer filed a notice contesting the claim under Section 14(d), or if the Labor Department excuses the delay as caused by conditions the employer could not control. A late payment under an award carries 20 percent instead.

Friedman, Rodman & Frank, P.A. represents civilian contractors in Defense Base Act claims, including claims where checks arrive late, stop without explanation, or start only after weeks of silence.

When the First DBA Payment Is Due

Section 14(b) makes the first installment due on the 14th day after the employer is notified of the injury or learns of it, and all compensation owed by then is due on that date. After that, payments are due twice a month unless the Labor Department sets a monthly or other schedule. Section 14(c) requires the employer to notify the Labor Department immediately when it makes the first payment and whenever it suspends payment for any reason.

A notice of controversion is the employer’s written statement to the Labor Department that it disputes the right to compensation, with the grounds for the dispute. Section 14(d) requires it to be filed on or before the 14th day after the employer learns of the injury, and it must name the claimant, the employer, and the date of the alleged injury.

The DBA Late Payment Penalty and Its Exceptions

The Section 14(e) addition applies to installments payable without an award, which covers the benefits a carrier is paying voluntarily early in a claim. If a $1,000 installment goes unpaid for more than 14 days past its due date, the carrier owes $1,100. The addition is compensation the contractor receives, not a fine paid to the government.

The carrier has two ways out. One is a notice of controversion filed under Section 14(d). The other is a showing to the Labor Department that conditions beyond the employer’s control prevented timely payment, which the Department must accept to excuse the delay. A carrier that did neither and paid late owes the addition.

Late Payments After an Award

Once an award is entered, Section 14(f) raises the addition to 20 percent on any compensation not paid within 10 days after it becomes due. The only exception is where the carrier seeks review of the award under Section 21 and the Benefits Review Board or a court issues an order staying payment. Section 14(h) separately requires the Labor Department, on notice from the contractor that payments have stopped or been suspended, to investigate, order medical examinations, or hold hearings as needed to protect the parties’ rights.

Tracking Late or Stopped DBA Payments

If your checks have arrived late, a simple log of each due date, each arrival date, and any notice from the carrier shows whether the 10 or 20 percent addition is owed. Friedman, Rodman & Frank, P.A. handles Defense Base Act claims for civilian contractors injured on overseas government contracts. Call (877) 448-8585 or contact our office for a free consultation about your Defense Base Act claim. There is no fee unless we recover for you.

The post When a DBA Check Is Late, the Carrier Can Owe 10 Percent More appeared first on Defense Base Act Attorneys | Friedman, Rodman & Frank, P.A..

Defense Base Act war hazards rules determine who pays when a civilian contractor is injured in a missile or drone attack on an overseas base, and renewed strikes on bases hosting U.S. forces have put that question in front of contractors again. Stars and Stripes reported that on August 31, 2026, Iran said it had launched ballistic missiles and drones at bases hosting U.S. forces, naming King Hussein and Al Azraq air bases in Jordan and Al Minhad Air Base in the United Arab Emirates. A U.S. official said there were no impacts at U.S. bases, and the UAE denied that Al Minhad was attacked. On September 9, Jordan’s military said it had engaged 20 ballistic missiles fired from Iran, and the Pentagon’s database of U.S. military casualties had listed 61 more Americans as wounded in action since the strikes resumed.

For a worker whose job is covered by the Defense Base Act, a claim for an attack injury is made against the employer’s insurance carrier like any other Defense Base Act claim. Benefits are set by the Longshore and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act rules that 42 U.S.C. § 1651(a) applies to overseas contract work. The War Hazards Compensation Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 1701 through 1717, governs a separate question, whether the federal government reimburses the carrier. At Friedman, Rodman & Frank, P.A., our Defense Base Act attorneys represent contractors on the claim itself, which is where an injured worker’s benefits come from.

What Counts as a War-Risk Hazard

A war-risk hazard is a hazard arising during a war or armed conflict from one of the sources listed in 42 U.S.C. § 1711(b), including the discharge of any missile and the use of any weapon or explosive by a hostile force or person. The definition covers an armed conflict involving the United States whether or not war was declared.

It also reaches a war or armed conflict between military forces of any origin in a country where the covered worker is serving, so the United States does not have to be one of the sides. Section 1711(c) defines a hostile force or person as a nation, a subject of a foreign nation, or anyone serving a foreign nation that is engaged in that kind of war or conflict.

Who Pays for Defense Base Act War Hazards Injuries

Section 1704(a) entitles an employer or carrier that pays benefits for an injury or death arising from a war-risk hazard to be reimbursed for all benefits paid or payable. That includes medical and hospital costs, funeral and burial expenses, and reasonable claims expense, paid from the compensation fund established under 5 U.S.C. § 8147. The carrier files its reimbursement claim with the Secretary of Labor. Section 1704(b) bars reimbursement where the carrier charged a premium that included an added charge for the war-risk hazard.

None of that reduces what the carrier owes the injured worker, since Section 1704 deals with money passing between the carrier and the government. Section 1704(a) does protect contractors in one practical way. It lets the Secretary pay benefits directly as they accrue, in place of reimbursement, and it provides that the insolvency of an employer or carrier does not affect a beneficiary’s right to receive those benefits directly from that fund.

When the War Hazards Act Pays a Contractor Directly

Section 1701(a) reaches a contractor’s employee covered by the Defense Base Act when no compensation is payable under the Defense Base Act for the injury or death. If the injury proximately results from a war-risk hazard, which in plain terms means the hazard caused it, benefits are paid from the federal fund as though the worker were a federal civil employee injured on duty. The statute applies whether or not the worker was actually on the job at the time.

Section 1701(d) carves out one group. A worker who lives at or near the place of employment, and is not living there solely because of the job, is excluded unless the injury happens in the course of employment.

Section 1701(b) treats a covered worker who is missing under circumstances supporting an inference that a hostile force or person caused the absence, or who is known to have been taken prisoner or hostage by a hostile force or person, as totally disabled for the purposes of that subsection. Benefits are credited to the worker’s account until the worker returns, or until death is established or can legally be presumed, and the Secretary may pay part of them to dependents living in the United States or its territories during the absence.

Starting a Claim After an Attack on a Base

A contractor hurt in one of these strikes should report the injury to the employer and keep every medical record from the first treatment onward, since the claim goes to the same Defense Base Act carrier as any other injury and the war hazards question is settled separately. Friedman, Rodman & Frank, P.A. represents civilian contractors injured on overseas government contracts, and we can look at which of these federal rules applies to your injury. Call (877) 448-8585 or contact our office for a free consultation about your Defense Base Act claim. There is no fee unless we recover for you.

The post Defense Base Act War Hazards Rules for Contractors Hurt in Missile and Drone Attacks appeared first on Defense Base Act Attorneys | Friedman, Rodman & Frank, P.A..

A Benefits Review Board decision published on March 20, 2026 addresses whether Defense Base Act benefits after a contract ends can be cut off because the overseas job itself no longer exists. In Woolum v. Arma Aviation, the employer and its insurance carrier argued that a contractor’s wage loss after August 30, 2021, the date the United States withdrew from Afghanistan, was caused

by the withdrawal rather than by his injury.

The Board rejected that argument and affirmed the award. It repeated the rule from its 2011 decision in Raymond v. Blackwater Security Consulting that “there is only one average weekly wage

per injury.” The withdrawal, the Board wrote, “was a future speculation at the time of Claimant’s injuries.”

On September 8, 2026, Stars and Stripes reported that retired Army Gen. David Petraeus, a former commander of U.S. Central Command, has called the former U.S. basing arrangements in the region “no longer viable,” pointing to Al Udeid Air Base as an example. The article describes an open question about whether the United States will repair damaged bases or shift to a lighter footprint. It does not report any announced drawdown. Friedman, Rodman & Frank, P.A. represents civilian contractors in Defense Base Act claims, including partial disability claims where the original job site has since shrunk or closed.

What the Board Decided in Woolum v. Arma Aviation

The claimant was an aircraft mechanic in Kabul whose sinus and nasal conditions, the administrative law judge found, became chronic after exposure to burn pits near his worksite and hotel. He left the job on October 15, 2020, and started work as an aircraft mechanic in the United States on April 11, 2021. The judge awarded him temporary partial disability from that date forward, measured against his lower wages at home.

Average weekly wage (AWW) is the pre-injury weekly earnings figure that every disability payment is measured against. The judge set it at $2,742.03 and set his wage-earning capacity at $1,012.57 a week, based on what he was actually earning. The carrier did not dispute that math. It argued instead that once the Kabul work ended for everyone, the injury was no longer what kept him from his old wage.

The Board treated Raymond as controlling. In that case, it held that a judge erred in cutting an injured security contractor’s benefits to $1 a week because he planned to stop working overseas. Woolum is a published decision of the Benefits Review Board, the Labor Department’s appeals body for these claims, and not a ruling of a federal court of appeals. The Board also cited an unpublished Ninth Circuit disposition that it acknowledged is not precedent.

How a Temporary Partial Disability Check Is Calculated

Temporary partial disability (TPD) is the benefit paid while an injured contractor is still healing but can earn some wages. Under Section 8(e) of the Longshore Act, 33 U.S.C. § 908(e), it equals two-thirds of the difference between the average weekly wage before the injury and the worker’s wage-earning capacity after it, “in the same or another employment.”

That provision reaches overseas contractors through 42 U.S.C. § 1651(a), which applies the Longshore Act to Defense Base Act work. Section 8(h), 33 U.S.C. § 908(h), sets wage-earning capacity by actual earnings when those earnings fairly and reasonably represent what the worker can earn. When they do not, capacity may be fixed from the injury, the worker’s usual employment, and other circumstances. Neither number depends on whether the old overseas job still exists.

Section 8(e) does carry a limit of its own, stating that temporary partial disability “shall not be paid for a period exceeding five years.” That limit comes from the statute, not from what happens to a base or a contract. A permanent partial disability outside the specific body-part losses listed in Section 8(c) is paid under Section 8(c)(21) “during the continuance of partial disability,” and that paragraph states no five-year limit.

What Happens to Defense Base Act Benefits After the Contract Ends

Under Woolum, a site closure is not by itself a reason to stop a partial disability check, because the average weekly wage was fixed on the day of the injury. A carrier that writes to say the contract is gone, and so the wage loss is gone, is making the argument the Board rejected. Contractors hurt while supporting operations at Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar had their average weekly wage set the same way, on the date of injury.

What can move the check is the other half of the formula. If your earnings rise at a new job, the gap narrows and so does the TPD payment. We ask contractors in this position to keep pay records from the overseas contract and from every job since, because those records are the evidence behind both numbers in the formula.

Questions About a Partial Disability Check After a Site Closes

Before accepting a carrier’s decision to stop partial disability benefits over a closed site or a lost contract, have that decision checked against Woolum. Friedman, Rodman & Frank, P.A. handles Defense Base Act claims for civilian contractors injured on overseas government contracts. We review DBA claims at no charge, wherever you were injured and wherever you are now. Call (877) 448-8585 or submit a case review to get started.

The post Does Your DBA Check Stop When Your Overseas Job Disappears? appeared first on Defense Base Act Attorneys | Friedman, Rodman & Frank, P.A..

Every October 1, the Department of Labor resets the compensation rates that govern Defense Base Act claims. The reset comes from Section 10(f) of the Longshore and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act, 33 U.S.C. § 910(f), which reaches overseas contractor claims through 42 U.S.C. § 1651(a), the provision applying the Longshore Act to Defense Base Act work.

Section 10(f) raises compensation and death benefits for permanent total disability or death, and it raises nothing else, which is narrower than most contractors expect. A contractor drawing temporary total disability while recovering from a crush injury will see the same figure on the October check as on the September one, and nothing has gone wrong when that happens. The Defense Base Act attorneys at Friedman, Rodman & Frank, P.A. answer this question every fall.

What the Defense Base Act Cost of Living Increase Actually Raises

The Defense Base Act cost of living increase is the annual October 1 adjustment under Section 10(f), which raises permanent total disability and death benefits by the lesser of the rise in the national average weekly wage or 5 percent. Permanent total disability is a formal finding in the claim that an injury has permanently left a worker unable to earn wages in suitable work, not a description of how severe an injury feels.

The 5 percent figure is a cap. In a year when the national average weekly wage climbs 6 percent, the increase stops at 5. In a year when it climbs 2 percent, the increase is 2.

Death benefits sit in the same sentence of the statute as permanent total disability, so a surviving spouse or child receiving Defense Base Act death benefits gets the October adjustment on the same terms. That is the one group most likely to be receiving benefits long enough for the increases to compound into real money.

Why a Temporary Total Disability Check Does Not Move

Section 6(c) of the Longshore Act, 33 U.S.C. § 906(c), is the provision naming who the annual determination reaches. It applies the new figures to employees and survivors currently receiving compensation for permanent total disability or death benefits during that period, and to those newly awarded compensation during it. Temporary total disability and permanent partial disability are absent from that list.

That absence is the answer for most contractors who write to us in October. A temporary total disability claim is by its nature the stage before anyone has decided whether an injury is permanent. We do look at whether a claim has been sitting in temporary status longer than the medical record supports, because that question is worth more to a contractor than the raise is.

The Numbers the Rate Is Built From

Section 6(b) of the Longshore and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act sets both the ceiling and the floor as percentages of the same national average weekly wage. The maximum weekly compensation is 200 percent of it, and the minimum for total disability is 50 percent, except that a worker whose own average weekly wage is lower receives that actual wage instead. A contractor whose pre-injury wage worked out to $400 a week is paid $400, not the statutory minimum.

The wage figure itself is not a forecast. Section 6(b)(3) has the Secretary of Labor determine it after June 30 each year from the three consecutive calendar quarters ending that day, which is why the number is fixed months before it takes effect and why it holds steady from October 1 through September 30.

For the year running October 1, 2025 through September 30, 2026, the Department of Labor set the national average weekly wage at $1,041.35, the maximum at $2,082.70, and the minimum at $520.68, after a 4.18 percent increase. The figures for the year beginning October 1, 2026 had not been published when this post was written. The table is national, so the same numbers apply whether your contract was performed in Kuwait or Guam.

Checking Whether Your Benefit Rate Is Right

A rate that looks wrong in October is sometimes an October problem and sometimes a sign that the average weekly wage was set too low at the start of the claim. Friedman, Rodman & Frank, P.A. represents civilian contractors injured on overseas government contracts, and we can look at how your rate was calculated and whether the adjustment should have reached it. Call (877) 448-8585 or contact our Defense Base Act team for a free consultation. We work on contingency, and you pay no fee unless we recover benefits for you.

The post Who Gets the Defense Base Act Cost of Living Increase appeared first on Defense Base Act Attorneys | Friedman, Rodman & Frank, P.A..

A contractor injured overseas can pursue a Defense Base Act claim and a separate lawsuit against the outside company whose negligence caused the injury, without choosing between the two. Section 33(a) of the Longshore and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act, 33 U.S.C. § 933(a), says so directly, and it governs DBA claims through 42 U.S.C. § 1651(a).

Section 33(g) of the same statute attaches a condition to that second claim. Settling with the third party for an amount less than the compensation the Act would pay requires written approval from both the employer and its insurance carrier, obtained before the settlement is executed. Where that approval is not obtained and filed, Section 33(g)(2) terminates all rights to compensation and medical benefits under the Act. The Defense Base Act attorneys at Friedman, Rodman & Frank, P.A. see this come up most often in vehicle and convoy cases.

What DBA Third Party Settlement Approval Requires

A third-party claim is a separate case against a company other than the employer whose negligence contributed to your injury. On an overseas contract that is often the trucking company that owned the vehicle, the subcontractor whose crew rigged the load, or the base-support firm that maintained the equipment. Convoy and base-support work puts contractors in Iraq alongside trucks, crews, and equipment owned by companies that are not their employer, which is where most third-party claims start.

Section 33(g)(1) is specific about what the approval has to be:

• In writing, from both the employer and the employer’s insurance carrier. One of the two signing is not enough.
• Obtained before the settlement is executed. The statute keys to signing, not to when the money arrives.
• On a form the Secretary of Labor provides, rather than in ordinary correspondence.
• Filed within 30 days after the settlement is entered into.

The condition that triggers the requirement is that the settlement comes in below the compensation the Act would pay. That figure is rarely knowable while a claim is still open, because it turns on how long a disability lasts and what the medical treatment ends up costing. We treat the approval as necessary in every third-party settlement for that reason.

The Forfeiture Reaches Workers Nobody Is Paying Yet

One reading of Section 33(g) that comes up often is that it binds only a contractor who is already collecting benefits. The Supreme Court closed that reading in Estate of Cowart v. Nicklos Drilling Co., 505 U.S. 469 (1992). Floyd Cowart settled a negligence case without written approval at a point when his employer had paid him nothing and was under no order to pay.

The Court held that the forfeiture provision applies to a worker whose employer, at the time of the settlement, is neither paying compensation nor subject to an order to pay. A person becomes entitled to compensation the moment the right to recover under the Act vests, whether or not anyone has acknowledged or adjudicated it. The Court recognized that the provision can work harshly and said that changing it belongs to Congress rather than the courts.

The practical reading for a contractor is that a claim that has been denied, or never filed, or left unanswered by the carrier is still a claim Section 33(g) can extinguish.

The Separate Duty to Report Any Settlement

Section 33(g)(2) carries two triggers, and only the first is about approval. Rights terminate where no written approval is obtained and filed as Section 33(g)(1) requires. Rights also terminate where the employee fails to notify the employer of any settlement obtained from, or judgment rendered against, a third person.

No dollar condition is attached to that second trigger. The approval requirement applies where a settlement comes in under the compensation entitlement. The notice duty applies to any settlement and to any judgment, including one that came out well. A contractor who wins at trial and tells no one has a reporting problem even though nothing was settled.

The statute adds that the termination stands regardless of whether the employer or the carrier has made payments or acknowledged entitlement to benefits, which puts the point the Court reached in Cowart into the text itself.

Before You Sign With a Third Party’s Insurer

An offer from a third party’s insurer usually arrives with no mention of Section 33(g), because the company making it has no duty to protect a Defense Base Act claim it is not paying. Friedman, Rodman & Frank, P.A. represents civilian contractors injured on overseas government contracts, and we can pursue the written approval before a settlement is signed rather than litigate the consequences afterward. Call (877) 448-8585 or submit a case review to talk it through. The consultation is free, and our fee comes out of what we recover, so there is nothing to pay if we recover nothing.

The post Why a DBA Third Party Settlement Needs Written Approval appeared first on Defense Base Act Attorneys | Friedman, Rodman & Frank, P.A..

Why Insurance Companies Request Independent Medical Examinations

An Independent Medical Examination is a medical evaluation requested by the insurance carrier rather than your treating physician. Although it is called an “independent” examination, the physician performing the evaluation is generally selected and paid by the insurance company.

An insurer may request an IME for several reasons. It may want another opinion regarding your diagnosis, your work restrictions, the need for additional treatment, or whether you have reached maximum medical improvement. In some cases, the insurance company questions whether your current symptoms relate to your workplace injury or believes your condition has improved enough to reduce or terminate benefits.

Receiving notice of an IME does not automatically mean your claim is in trouble. Insurance carriers routinely use these examinations during disputed and ongoing Defense Base Act claims. Still, the results of the evaluation can influence important decisions about your medical care and disability benefits.

What Happens During a Defense Base Act IME?

Most Independent Medical Examinations begin with a review of your medical history and the circumstances surrounding your injury. The examining physician will typically ask questions about your symptoms, treatment history, current limitations, medications, and daily activities.

The physician may also perform a physical examination or psychological evaluation, depending on the nature of your injuries. If your claim involves PTSD or another psychological condition, the evaluation may include questions about your emotional health, sleep patterns, concentration, and ability to function at work and home.

Although the appointment may feel similar to a regular doctor’s visit, there is one important difference. The physician performing the IME usually does not provide ongoing treatment or develop your recovery plan. Instead, the doctor prepares a report for the insurance company summarizing the examination and offering medical opinions about your condition.

That report may later become evidence if your claim proceeds to a hearing.

How to Prepare for an Independent Medical Examination

Preparing for an IME does not mean rehearsing answers or exaggerating your injuries. Instead, your goal should be to provide accurate and consistent information about your condition.

Before the appointment, review your medical history so you can answer questions accurately. Be prepared to explain how your injury occurred, what treatment you have received, and how your symptoms affect your daily life and ability to work.

During the examination, answer questions honestly without minimizing or overstating your condition. If a movement causes pain, explain what you experience instead of trying to push through discomfort simply to appear cooperative.

You should also pay close attention to the questions asked during the evaluation. If you do not understand a question, ask for clarification rather than guessing. Clear communication helps create a more accurate record of your condition.

What If the IME Differs From Your Treating Doctor’s Opinion?

It is not uncommon for an Independent Medical Examination to reach conclusions that differ from those of your treating physician. For example, the IME doctor may recommend fewer work restrictions, conclude that additional treatment is unnecessary, or determine that you have reached maximum medical improvement sooner than expected.

That does not mean the insurance company’s physician has the final word.

Your treating physician has often spent months evaluating your injuries, monitoring your progress, and adjusting your treatment plan. Those records frequently provide a much more complete picture of your recovery than a single examination.

If disputes arise, medical records, diagnostic testing, expert opinions, and testimony from your treating physicians may all help establish the full extent of your injuries.

An Experienced Attorney Can Help Protect Your Defense Base Act Claim

Independent Medical Examinations can have a significant impact on a Defense Base Act claim. The findings may affect ongoing medical treatment, disability benefits, work restrictions, and future compensation.

An experienced Defense Base Act attorney understands how insurance companies use IMEs and can help you prepare before the examination. If the IME report contains inaccurate conclusions or conflicts with your treating physician’s findings, your attorney can present medical evidence that supports your claim and challenge opinions that are not supported by the record.

If you have been scheduled for an Independent Medical Examination after an overseas workplace injury, do not assume the process is routine or without consequences. Understanding your rights and obtaining experienced legal guidance can help protect your health, your benefits, and your financial future.

The post Independent Medical Examinations in Defense Base Act Cases: What to Expect and How to Protect Your Rights appeared first on Defense Base Act Attorneys | Friedman, Rodman & Frank, P.A..

The Defense Base Act Gives Injured Workers Important Medical Rights

Many injured workers assume the insurance company gets to decide where they receive treatment. Under the Defense Base Act, that is not generally how the process works.

The DBA allows injured workers to select a treating physician to provide medical care for work-related injuries. This right exists because your treating physician serves an important role throughout your claim. Your doctor diagnoses your injuries, recommends treatment, documents your progress, and determines whether you have work restrictions or permanent impairment.

Choosing a physician you trust can make a meaningful difference throughout your recovery. Your treating doctor becomes the medical professional who follows your condition over time rather than evaluating you during a single appointment.

While you generally have the right to choose your treating physician, there may be exceptions depending on the circumstances surrounding your injury, emergency medical treatment, or disputes that arise during the claims process. Speaking with an attorney early can help you avoid misunderstandings that could delay your care.

Your Treating Physician Does More Than Provide Medical Care

Medical treatment does more than help you recover from your injury. Every office visit creates documentation that may become important evidence in your Defense Base Act claim.

Your physician records your symptoms, diagnoses your condition, orders imaging or testing when appropriate, and recommends future treatment. Your doctor also evaluates how your injury affects your ability to perform your job duties.

For example, a contractor who suffered a back injury may receive restrictions against heavy lifting or prolonged standing. A worker diagnosed with PTSD may need limitations involving stressful environments or extended deployments. These medical opinions often influence disability benefits and return-to-work decisions.

Consistent treatment also helps establish a clear timeline of your recovery. Large gaps in treatment sometimes allow insurance companies to argue that an injury has improved or no longer requires ongoing care.

What If the Insurance Company Questions Your Treatment?

Insurance carriers do not always agree with the recommendations made by a treating physician. They may question whether certain procedures, diagnostic testing, medications, or therapy sessions are medically necessary.

In some cases, the insurance company may request an independent medical examination (IME) to obtain another physician’s opinion. The doctor performing the IME does not become your treating physician. Instead, the examination typically serves as an evaluation for the insurance carrier.

An IME report may differ from your treating physician’s findings. The examining physician may disagree about your diagnosis, your work restrictions, or whether additional treatment is necessary.

These disagreements do not automatically determine the outcome of your claim. Your treating physician’s records, objective medical evidence, and other expert opinions may all play a role in resolving disputes.

Can You Change Doctors During a Defense Base Act Claim?

There are situations where an injured worker may wish to change physicians during treatment. Perhaps communication has broken down, you have relocated, or your medical needs require a different type of specialist.

Changing physicians under the Defense Base Act may be possible, but it should not happen without understanding the applicable rules. Seeking treatment from another physician without following the proper procedures could create unnecessary disputes over payment for medical care.

Before making changes, discuss your situation with your attorney. Legal guidance can help protect your right to continued medical treatment while avoiding delays or disagreements with the insurance carrier.

An Attorney Can Help Protect Your Right to Medical Care

Medical treatment forms the foundation of nearly every Defense Base Act claim. The physician you choose documents your injuries, recommends treatment, evaluates your recovery, and provides opinions that may affect your disability benefits.

If disputes arise over your medical care, legal representation can help protect your interests. An experienced Defense Base Act attorney can address disagreements with the insurance carrier, work with your treating physicians, and pursue the benefits available under the law.

If you were injured while working overseas on a government contract, understanding your rights from the beginning can make a meaningful difference. Receiving appropriate medical care from a physician you trust not only supports your recovery but also strengthens the evidence supporting your Defense Base Act claim.

The post Can You Choose Your Own Doctor in a Defense Base Act Claim? What Overseas Contractors Should Know appeared first on Defense Base Act Attorneys | Friedman, Rodman & Frank, P.A..

Insurance Companies May Look Beyond Your Medical Records

Most people think a Defense Base Act claim depends only on medical records and accident reports. Those documents remain the foundation of your case, but they are not the only information an insurance carrier may consider.

Claims adjusters and investigators frequently review publicly available social media accounts during the claims process. Photos, videos, comments, location tags, and even posts made by friends or family members can become part of an investigation. Their goal is to determine whether your online activity appears consistent with the injuries you reported.

For example, you may post a smiling family photo during a birthday celebration. While that image may only capture a single moment, an insurance company could argue that it contradicts your reports of chronic pain or emotional distress. Likewise, a short video showing you lifting a child or walking on uneven ground may not tell the full story, but it could still become evidence in a disputed claim.

That does not mean you should stop living your life. It does mean you should understand how seemingly harmless posts may be interpreted by someone looking for reasons to limit benefits.

PTSD and Invisible Injuries Can Face Extra Scrutiny

Many Defense Base Act claims involve injuries that cannot be seen in a photograph. Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), traumatic brain injuries, chronic pain, and other conditions often fluctuate from day to day.

Someone receiving treatment for PTSD may attend a family gathering or enjoy dinner with friends while still experiencing significant anxiety, nightmares, or emotional triggers. A single social media post rarely reflects what someone experiences before or after that event.

Insurance companies sometimes attempt to use isolated images or comments to question invisible injuries. Without proper medical evidence, they may argue that your condition has improved or that your limitations are less severe than reported.

Consistent medical treatment remains one of the strongest ways to document these injuries. Your healthcare providers can explain how PTSD and other psychological conditions affect your daily life, even when you appear outwardly healthy.

Common Online Mistakes That Can Affect a DBA Claim

You do not have to post something dramatic to create problems for your claim. Even routine activity can become part of an investigation.

Examples include:

• Posting photos or videos of physical activities
• Checking into gyms, sporting events, or vacations
• Discussing your injury or claim online
• Accepting friend requests from people you do not know
• Allowing others to tag you in photos without reviewing them first

Privacy settings also have limits. Even private accounts may become discoverable during litigation under certain circumstances. Friends or relatives may also share your content publicly without your knowledge.

The safest approach is to avoid discussing your injury, recovery, or legal claim on social media while your case remains pending.

Protecting Your Rights During a Defense Base Act Claim

You do not have to disappear from social media after a workplace injury, but you should use it carefully.

Continue following your physician’s treatment plan and attend every scheduled appointment. Honest, consistent medical documentation carries far more weight than a photograph or social media post.

If an insurance company raises questions about your online activity, avoid responding directly or trying to explain the situation yourself. Statements made without legal guidance can create additional issues.

Instead, discuss any concerns with your attorney. An attorney handling Defense Base Act claims can place social media evidence into the proper context while presenting medical records, expert opinions, and other evidence that accurately reflects your condition.

Every claim deserves an evaluation based on the full picture, not isolated moments captured online.

Experienced Legal Representation Can Help Protect Your Claim

Defense Base Act claims often involve insurance companies that actively investigate injuries and challenge disability benefits. Social media has become another tool they may use during that process.

An experienced Defense Base Act attorney understands these tactics and knows how to respond when an insurer attempts to misrepresent online activity. Your attorney can work with your treating physicians, gather supporting evidence, and present a complete picture of how your injury affects your ability to work and live your daily life.

If you were injured while working overseas under a government contract, do not let an avoidable mistake put your benefits at risk. Speaking with an attorney early in the process can help protect your claim and allow you to focus on your recovery.

The post Can Social Media Hurt Your Defense Base Act Claim? What Overseas Contractors Need to Know appeared first on Defense Base Act Attorneys | Friedman, Rodman & Frank, P.A..

Why Many Injured Contractors Feel Pressure to Return

An injury can disrupt every part of your life. You may worry about paying your bills, supporting your family, or maintaining your professional reputation. Contractors often work in demanding environments where they feel responsible for their teams and projects. Those concerns can make it tempting to return before your body or mind has fully recovered.

In some situations, an employer may offer modified duties or suggest that you are ready to resume work. In others, you may simply feel guilty about remaining off the job. Although those feelings are understandable, they should not replace sound medical advice.

Returning to work before you have recovered can worsen your condition, extend your recovery, or create new injuries. It can also make it more difficult to show the true impact of your workplace injury if disputes arise later in your Defense Base Act claim.

Your Medical Restrictions Matter

Your treating physician plays an important role in determining when you can safely return to work. Medical restrictions exist to protect your health while allowing you to recover as fully as possible.

For example, your physician may determine that you should avoid lifting heavy equipment, standing for extended periods, climbing ladders, traveling internationally, or working in high-stress environments. These restrictions often reflect your current physical or psychological condition rather than your long-term prognosis.

Ignoring those restrictions can create problems. If you return to duties that exceed your medical limitations, an insurance carrier may argue that your injury has improved more than your medical records indicate. If your symptoms become worse afterward, the insurer could also attempt to blame your decision to return rather than the original workplace injury.

Following your physician’s recommendations helps protect both your health and your claim.

Returning to Work Can Affect Disability Benefits

Defense Base Act benefits vary depending on your medical condition and your ability to earn wages after an injury. Returning to work may change the type or amount of disability benefits you receive.

If you remain completely unable to work, you may qualify for temporary total disability benefits. If your physician clears you for limited work with restrictions, you may instead receive temporary partial disability benefits if your earnings decrease because of those limitations.

Insurance companies closely monitor changes in employment status. A return to work, even on a part-time or modified schedule, may prompt the insurer to review your ongoing eligibility for benefits.

That does not mean you should refuse suitable work simply to continue receiving compensation. Instead, you should make employment decisions based on your physician’s recommendations and a clear understanding of how those decisions may affect your claim.

Maximum Medical Improvement Is an Important Milestone

Many injured workers hear the term “maximum medical improvement,” or MMI, during a Defense Base Act case. MMI does not necessarily mean you have fully recovered. Instead, it generally means your condition has improved as much as your doctors reasonably expect through medical treatment.

Reaching MMI often marks an important transition in your claim. Your physician may evaluate whether you have a permanent impairment, ongoing work restrictions, or the ability to return to your previous occupation.

Returning to work before reaching MMI may make it harder to evaluate the lasting effects of your injury. If your condition continues to change, your disability rating and future benefits could also change.

Allowing your medical providers to complete the recovery process gives them a clearer picture of your long-term condition.

Legal Guidance Can Help You Make Informed Decisions

Every Defense Base Act claim presents different challenges. Some injured workers recover quickly, while others face months or years of treatment for physical injuries, traumatic brain injuries, or PTSD.

An experienced Defense Base Act attorney can help you understand how employment decisions may affect your benefits. Your attorney can review your medical records, communicate with the insurance carrier, and work to protect your right to compensation while you recover.

Returning to work is an important milestone, but it should happen at the right time and under the right circumstances. If you were injured while working overseas under a U.S. government contract, speaking with an attorney before making major decisions about your employment can help protect your health, your financial future, and your Defense Base Act claim.

The post Why Returning to Work Too Soon Can Reduce the Value of Your Defense Base Act Claim appeared first on Defense Base Act Attorneys | Friedman, Rodman & Frank, P.A..